Pope Leo in Africa, Trump explodes against the Pope, "I'm not afraid, I'm not going to argue with him," the first reactions, Tucho and Pope Francis, will he vote in Peru?, "adjust to the truth," the happiness of the Heralds.

Pope Leo in Africa, Trump explodes against the Pope, "I'm not afraid, I'm not going to argue with him," the first reactions, Tucho and Pope Francis, will he vote in Peru?, "adjust to the truth," the happiness of the Heralds.

We start the week, some news devours others with a portentous speed. Pope Leo has begun his third apostolic journey, this one to Africa starting with Algeria, following in the footsteps of Saint Augustine. Trump has exploded and it seems that the differences between the Vatican and the President of the United States are much deeper than we thought until now. Let’s try to tell where we are now, perhaps in a few hours we will be in another scenario. The balances of the Second World War have ended and we don’t know very well where all this will end, it’s all stirred up, the old formulas have fallen and the new ones resist appearing.

The trip to Africa has begun.

The Pope departed this morning, April 13, from Rome’s Fiumicino airport to begin his apostolic journey, the longest since the beginning of his ministry, to Algeria, cradle of Saint Augustine, Cameroon, Angola, and Equatorial Guinea. He will spend eleven days visiting a dozen cities. He arrived in Algiers after a flight of approximately two hours. , In Algeria, the Pope Leo XIV paid homage to the Monument to the Martyrs of Maqam Echahid after the welcome ceremony, inaugurated in 1982 to commemorate the twentieth anniversary of independence. Today, April 13, he also made a courtesy visit to the President of the Republic and met with authorities, civil society, and the diplomatic corps. In the afternoon, the Pope visited the Great Mosque of Algiers and made a private visit to the Welcome and Friendship Center of the Augustinian Missionary Sisters of Bab El Oued. This visit pays homage to the memory of two nuns murdered on October 23, 1994, during the Algerian civil war. The day concluded with a meeting with the Algerian community.

Trump explodes against Pope Leo.

The power that cannot bear to be judged and Trump, in his vulgar and deranged attack against Pope Leo XIV in the last hours, without realizing it, has painted his own most faithful portrait : that of a man who confuses strength with authority, consensus with legitimacy, the silence of others with surrender.  His words would not deserve a response if they were not an unsettling symptom of something broader and more dangerous: the tendency of certain populist politicians to treat every moral institution as an obstacle that must be demolished, every critical voice as an enemy that must be delegitimized, every spiritual authority as a tool that must be manipulated for electoral purposes.

The world is filled with politicians who  have adopted his same methods: the reckless assertion, the opportunistic slander, the lie repeated until it seems true. We see it daily in a scenario where verbal violence has no price and the truth is always negotiable. People attack, slander, distort, and when someone points out the error, the publication disappears silently, without rectification, without apology, as if it had never existed. This is the grammar of populism: arrogance in the attack, cowardice in the retreat. What makes all this not only reprehensible, but dangerous, is that Trump is not an anonymous neighborhood provocateur. He is the President of the United States of America. And when the most powerful man in the world adopts the tone of a bully, he does not do it in a vacuum: he legitimizes  it, normalizes it, transforms it into a model.

 Trump accuses Leo XIV of being «indulgent with crime», of not understanding the «greatness» of the United States, of playing into the hands of the radical left. He exhorts him to «return to normality». He even goes so far as to claim credit for his election, declaring that without him, «Leo would not be in the Vatican». These claims are not only false, but radically alien to any understanding—even the most minimal—of what the Catholic Church is, its nature, its mission, its mystery. Romano Guardini in Power (1951):  «Power is not evil in itself, but it becomes destructive when it is considered absolute and refuses to be judged by any higher authority». This is precisely what happens when a head of state arrogates to himself the right to judge the Vicar of Christ and tell him how he should behave.

The president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops responded with measured but unequivocal words: «I am saddened that the President has chosen to write such offensive words about the Holy Father. Pope Leo is not his rival; nor ​​is the Pope a politician. He is the Vicar of Christ who speaks from the truth of the Gospel and for the care of souls » . 

What Trump has done is an attempt to publicly humiliate the leader of one of the oldest and most rooted spiritual institutions in human civilization , using language typical of bullies—disrespectful, fallacious, arrogant—to assert that no moral voice has the right to exist outside his control. It is not the first time that political power has tried to silence the Church. Henry VIII did it, the Jacobins did it, Bismarck did it with the Kulturkampf , the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century did it. But those episodes occurred within the framework of complex historical conflicts, in times when the structures of international law did not exist or were incipient. Today, in 2025, a democratically elected president insults the Pope on a social network because he dared to remind him that there are values—peace, human dignity, care for the poor—that are not measured in stock points or crime statistics.

This is an act of institutional intimidation that the free press, diplomacy, and politics—of all kinds—have the duty to condemn without ambiguity. Silence or minimization would be complicit.

Hannah Arendt, in The Origins of Totalitarianism , observed that one of the characteristics of totalitarian thinking is the denial of any reality that is not functional to the system of domination: «The totalitarian does not debate: it erases. It does not refute: it destroys». Trump does not go—as far as now—to physical destruction. But symbolic destruction, public delegitimization, the reduction of his adversary to a puppet manipulated by enemies, these are his tools.

In the midst of the controversy, the Pope has undertaken his third apostolic journey —the longest since the beginning of his pontificate— and his priorities demonstrate, better than any denial, how little the invectives from Washington affect him. Journalists will undoubtedly try to involve him in the dispute during the press conference upon his return from Equatorial Guinea; that is their method, and it would be naive to expect otherwise, but Leo will not lower himself to that ground.  Not responding is not weakness; it is the highest expression of authority.

«I am not afraid, I am not going to argue with him».

«I am not afraid of the Trump government. I speak of the Gospel. I will continue to speak out against the war », the Pope responded to the media on the way to Algiers after Trump’s attack. «I have no intention of debating with him».  The attack by the US president comes after the pontiff’s comments on the threat from Trump on the day of the ultimatum to Iran, when the US leader declared: «Tonight an entire civilization will die.» «This is unacceptable».  There are certainly issues of international law, but much more: the moral issue of the good of the people, and I would like to invite everyone to reflect deeply on the many innocent people, the many children, the many elderly, totally innocent, who would also be victims of this escalation of a war that has already begun». «From the first days» of the conflict «we said: let’s return to dialogue, let’s seek a way to resolve problems without reaching this point». It is about finding «how to communicate with the authorities to tell them that we do not want war. We are a people who love peace».

The Vatican’s response.

«He has excommunicated himself» is the cold and silent comment that is leaking from the Vatican . The harsh statements of the president Donald Trump have caused surprise in the Secretariat of State of the Holy See.  An unprecedented attack that marks an unimaginable breach between the White House and the Vatican. While the Western world begins to become aware of Trump’s penultimate diatribe, the silence of the Vatican is more emblematic than ever. Disarmed and captivating, the brilliant smile of blessing from Pope Leo XIV, as he departed for the birthplace of Saint Augustine, a giant of the faith capable of speaking to the heart of anyone and the inspiration of his pontificate, will find the right words during his trip to Africa to forgive, appease, and leave even the indomitable Trump in the whirlwind of history.

Cupich, McElroy and Tobin in 60 Minutes.

The president’s post came immediately after CBS aired a 60 Minutes segment dedicated to Leo XIV’s Church. In the interview, the three American cardinals who lead archdioceses—Cupich, McElroy, and Tobin—defended the Pope’s positions in an unprecedented joint interview. Cardinal Robert McElroy denied that the conflict in Iran meets the criteria for a just war according to Catholic doctrine: «It is a war of choice». Cardinal Blase Cupich denounced the «gamification» of war in White House videos: «We are dehumanizing the victims by turning suffering into entertainment». Cardinal Joseph Tobin reiterated his characterization of ICE as a «lawless organization» and noted that attendance at Spanish masses in his archdiocese had decreased by 30 percent in a year. Archbishop Paul Coakley , president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, responded to the attack with the following statement: «The Pope is not the president’s rival, nor a politician. He is the Vicar of Christ, who speaks from the truth of the Gospel and for the care of souls».

The reaction of the American bishops.

Paul S. Coakley of Oklahoma City and president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops responded to President Trump’s attacks against Leo XIV. «I am saddened that the President has chosen to write such offensive words about the Holy Father. Pope Leo XIV is not his rival, nor is he a politician. He is the Vicar of Christ who speaks from the truth of the Gospel and for the care of souls».

The Italian bishops support the Pope.

The Presidency of the Italian Episcopal Conference, renewing its «full communion with the Holy Father Leo XIV», expresses its «regret for the words addressed to him in the last hours by the President of the United States, Donald Trump». «In a moment marked by international conflict and tension, his voice represents an imperative call to human dignity, dialogue, and responsibility. The Churches in Italy renew their closeness, affection, and prayers to the Holy Father, hoping for respect from all toward him and his ministry».

Spadaro SJ : «Trump’s declaration of impotence».

«Donald Trump attacks Pope Leo XIV. And in doing so, he reveals a deep unease. When political power attacks a moral voice, it is because it cannot contain it. Trump is not talking about Leo XIV: he is begging him to return to a language that can be imposed». «But the Pope speaks a different language, one that cannot be reduced to the grammar of force, security, or national interest». «In this sense, the attack is a declaration of impotence. Unable to assimilate that voice, those who hold power try to delegitimize it. But in doing so, they implicitly recognize its weight. If Leo were irrelevant, he would not deserve a word. Instead, he is questioned, named, challenged: a sign that his words have impact. This is where the moral strength of the Church emerges. Not as a counterpower, but as a space in which power is judged according to a criterion it does not control. Leo does not respond with polemics, and for this very reason, he remains out of reach. He is free. And that freedom, disarmed and disarming, is perhaps the most unsettling. And, at the same time, the most important».

Message from Meloni to Pope Leo.

There is a message from the President of the Republic before his long apostolic journey to Africa where he did not mention Trump.  The Italian government: «On behalf of the Italian Government and on my own behalf, I wish to express to Pope Leo XIV my sincere gratitude and best wishes for the success of his apostolic journey, which will take him to Africa for the first time and include visits to four countries: Algeria, Cameroon, Angola, and Equatorial Guinea. May the ministry of the Holy Father foster the resolution of conflicts and the return of peace , both internal and between nations, following the path traced by his predecessors, and provide support and consolation to the Christian communities he will encounter during his journey».

The tense relationship between Trump and Pope Leo. 

Interesting article by Bill Barrow in Associated Press . Barrow begins his article by noting that, for the first time in history, the most influential critic of the US president does not reside in the United States, but in the Vatican. It is an unprecedented scenario: two Americans, both from the baby boomer generation, facing off from the two highest moral and political positions in the Western world. Trump, seventy-nine years old, born in Queens; Leo XIV, seventy, raised in Chicago. They belong to the same generation, share part of their cultural roots, but have opposite worldviews. «They are two white men from the baby boomer generation, but their life experiences, their values, and the way they have decided to live them could not be more different».

The Trump administration has explicitly claimed divine approval for the conflict with Iran. The Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, urged Americans to pray «in the name of Jesus Christ» for victory. Trump himself, when asked about the topic, responded: «Yes, because God is good and God wants people to be taken care of.» Reverend Franklin Graham described Trump as someone God «chose for a moment like this.» Leo responded harshly in his Palm Sunday message, declaring that God «does not listen to the prayers of those who make war, but rejects them», citing the book of Isaiah: «Even if you pray many times, I will not listen to you; your hands are full of blood». Precise and forceful biblical language, impossible to misinterpret. The risk is that all this remains irrelevant to the faithful: «Partisan preferences always prevail over religious commitments». And in current America «the icon of Catholicism in US politics is J.D. Vance», a Catholicism more focused on dialectical confrontation than on the Gospel.

Tucho and Pope Francis.

Interview with Fernández, prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith on the first anniversary of the death of Pope Francis: what is your last memory? «In one of the last audiences I had with him, when he could hardly speak anymore, he looked at me, smiled, and repeated a phrase he had already said to me in the past, in very important moments: «Be humble and trust.»» What did he mean? «To renounce all forms of pride and show humility, because in this way God can accomplish a great work through oneself». Reviewing these 12 years of pontificate, what is the moment that has marked you the most? «The first time he called me Pope, his first words were: ‘I am Bergoglio.’ It seems trivial, but I think it says a lot about this man’s humility.»

His insistence on proclaiming the Gospel with the heart, as a declaration of infinite love. In addition, his application of the hierarchy of truths not only to ecumenism, but to all preaching and evangelization. The effects have been enormous. To this is added his condemnation of the death penalty, which, unfortunately, even today, the most traditionalist groups resist. Pope Leo XIII has expressed in various ways the need to continue welcoming Francis’s teaching. For example, before the consistory, he asked the cardinals to reread Evangelii Gaudium and then invited us to reflect again on its application. Now he has convened the presidents of the Episcopal Conferences to resume the reception of Amoris Laetitia. These are signs that help us understand that Francis is not stalled. Certainly, for those who rejected all his teachings or those who only accepted them apparently, his pontificate will have been simply a bad interlude (forgetting the hermeneutic of continuity).

Is Leo X erasing the Bergoglian era? «Each Pope has his own style and priorities, but to say that Pope Leo X wants to erase what was achieved during Francis’s pontificate is dishonest. Each new Pope reaps the fruits of his predecessor and works for the good of the Church, looking forward. There are many points in common between Leo X and Francis; instead of opposition, we should see complementarity». «He receives so many requests from bishops and other dicasteries that the Holy Father tries not to add more commitments. He follows with great attention the reports I present to him in the frequent audiences and always responds clearly to questions and concerns.»

The patriarch of the Chaldean church.

Emil Nona, former archbishop of Mosul until the forced exodus after the ISIS conquest in 2014, is the new patriarch of the Chaldean Church. He was elected by the Synod of the ancient Eastern Church of Iraqi Christians (approximately 600,000 faithful worldwide), gathered in Rome to elect the successor to Patriarch Sako.  «His Beatitude announced his acceptance of the election in accordance with the norms of canon law, expressing his trust in God’s grace and his commitment to exercise the patriarchal service with a spirit of honesty and responsibility, in full communion with the synodal Fathers and at the service of the unity and mission of the Chaldean Church in its homeland and in the countries of the diaspora». Pope Leo XIII received in private audience the 17 Chaldean bishops, gathered in Rome since April 9 for the election of the new patriarch, successor to Cardinal Louis Raphael Sako, who resigned on March 10.

Pope Leo will not vote in Peru.

Born in the United States and with Peruvian nationality after having developed more than 20 years of pastoral life in that country, he was on the list of voters for the general elections in Peru, but is exempt from paying the fine for not voting as he is over 65 years old. His presence on the list of voters means that Leo XIV did not process the change of registration at the Peruvian consulate in Rome to vote at that consular headquarters before the electoral roll closed. In Peru, voting is mandatory for people between 18 and 64 years old, under a fine ranging from 27.50 to 110 soles (between 8.16 and 32.65 dollars) depending on the economic condition of the voter.

There are those who lie and confess it: better embarrassed than convicted.

We cannot be wrong in some information, without a doubt, and it is wise to correct. What is terrible is when this is the normal way of acting and becomes the norm. The little-read Religión Digital has acknowledged errors in information published about Opus Dei after the lawsuit for slander filed by the prelature. The medium admits that it disseminated serious accusations «that do not conform to reality and lack foundation and prior verification», in other words, that it lied and, faced with a more than foreseeable conviction, backs down.  In its rectification, the medium expressly acknowledges that «serious accusations are made that do not conform to reality and lack foundation and prior verification on the part of its author». The agreement reached between the parties required correcting the information, evidencing that the initial contents did not meet the basic standards of journalistic practice. This episode adds to previous controversies that have affected Religión Digital, fueling the perception that it is not an isolated incident. The medium has the backing of certain sectors linked to the Catholic Church and to Messengers of Peace, which increases its responsibility in handling false information.

Lawsuits and complaints are a risk that we who expose ourselves to public opinion every day face. It is legitimate and just  that anyone who feels unjustly offended defends themselves.  We remember that in May 2021, the convicted bishop Gustavo Zanchetta, protected by Pope Francis threatened InfoVaticana with a lawsuit, demanding 300,000 euros and also wanting to know who Specola was. He finally carried out his threat and filed the lawsuit against InfoVaticana. The unjustified attempt did not last long and on December 24, 2021, an Order from the Court of Instruction No. 34 of Madrid was Dismissal of Zanchetta’s lawsuit against InfoVaticana: «The complainant, Emeritus Bishop of New Oran, Argentina, directs the lawsuit against the aforementioned media outlet, attributing to the authors Mr. Carlos Esteban and the one who writes under the pseudonym SPECOLA, for insults and slanders in their publications».

In the order it is stated that the prelate “is a public figure” who, as the Supreme Court points out, “is obliged to bear a greater risk that his rights may be affected by opinions or information of general interest”. “Bishop Zanchetta has been written about in numerous media outlets, not only in digital press, but in mainstream, and not only in national, but in foreign press, and precisely what the sued authors collect in their articles are information and analyses from other foreign media, mainly Italian and Argentine”.

“In a democratic society, the free press is one of its fundamental pillars, and in that sense, I understand that the publications of the sued medium are protected by freedom of expression, a right enshrined in article 20 of the Spanish Constitution”.  The judge makes it clear in the dispositive part of the order that «the lawsuit is dismissed, ordering its inadmissibility for processing». In the month of May, the conciliation act took place at the Court of First Instance No. 68 of Madrid, instigated by the prelate against InfoVaticana, which refused to meet the unacceptable demands of the convicted bishop; that was when Zanchetta took a further step and filed the criminal lawsuit against InfoVaticana.

Between charity and philanthropy: secular holiness.

Mattarella, the President of Italy, awarded 28 young people for their civic spirit and courage: a ceremony  with shades of secular religiosity, in a world that pretends to function as if God did not exist.  The «secular saints» are fine, but first we need «Christian saints». President Sergio Mattarella awarded the title of Standard Bearer of the Republic to 28 young people who distinguished themselves for their civic spirit, responsibility, and courage. Among them were a 13-year-old boy who saved a friend’s life who was drowning by performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a 17-year-old poet, and a young woman deeply committed to the Red Cross who organizes first aid courses.

The context was that of republican institutions and, therefore, secular, but the idea of a «secular holiness» may also have arisen in many, a concept that evokes religion.  The argument is that if it is possible to be altruistic and disinterested without religion, then the world has reached maturity, it is capable of acting on its own, of autonomously guaranteeing its own moral resources and no longer needs God. Everything in the world seems to function as if God did not exist, including social ethics, which has its own values and defenders who embody them.  This «secular religion» even emerges as superior to the «religious religion», becoming the criterion of admissibility and public legitimacy.

It is presumed that those young people were motivated solely by secular ethical reasons, but who can confirm it? Moreover, the young people awarded by Mattarella were certainly not driven to those acts of commitment by the Constitution, but rather by a natural morality inherent in every human being, which invites us to do good. It was the natural moral law that drove that thirteen-year-old boy to save his friend from drowning, not the principles of the Republic. The preservation of the principles of the natural moral law in common sense is also due to Christianity, which does not arise once the natural plane has followed its course, but questions it from the beginning, preserving and purifying it. As secularization advances, the defense of natural law also weakens, but it remains, though unnoticed, in its intimate bonds with religion. Even if the secular world considers itself adult and mature, a world in which God is invisible, the sediments of Christianity are still present.

Benedict XVI mentioned it in Aparecida in 2007: «Where God is absent—God with the human face of Jesus Christ—, these values do not manifest themselves with all their force, nor is there consensus about them. I do not mean to say that non-believers cannot live a high and exemplary morality; I only say that a society in which God is absent lacks the necessary consensus on moral values and the strength to live according to the model of these values, even against their own interests».

The joy of the Heralds of the Gospel.

It shows, they have had patience and with  the ordination of 26 priests, it consolidates growth and international presence. Twenty-six deacons of the Heralds of the Gospel were ordained priests through the imposition of hands by Cardinal Dom Raymundo Damasceno Assis, Emeritus Archbishop of Aparecida. The ceremony brought together not only ecclesiastical authorities, family members, and members of the institution, but also numerous civil authorities and representatives from legal, academic, business, and cultural spheres, who were present to honor the celebration, highlighting the growing importance and influence of the institution in Brazilian society. Since the first priestly ordination of the institution in 2005, the number of priests affiliated with the Heralds of the Gospel has grown steadily, which has allowed the expansion of pastoral, missionary, educational, and social activities carried out in several countries. The Heralds of the Gospel maintain a presence in numerous countries in America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, where they carry out evangelization activities, religious formation, spiritual retreats, missions, teaching of music and sacred art, organization of cultural events, and social projects. The newly ordained priests come from different countries, including Brazil, Portugal, Spain, Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Peru, and El Salvador, reflecting the international character of the institution and the diversity of vocations that flourish within it. The ordination of these twenty-six new priests represents a new impetus for the institution’s evangelizing activities, which continues to expand its presence and works in different parts of the world. The ceremony held in Caieiras thus becomes part of the recent history of the institution, as another milestone in its development and growing presence worldwide.
«…unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the Kingdom of God».
Good reading.

L’ex arcivescovo di Mosul eletto nuovo Patriarca dei caldei

Pontificia ipocrisia da tanto al chilo

Papa Leone XIV contro Trump: il confronto inedito tra due americani

Leone XIV riceve il cardinale Bertello: si chiude la visita apostolica ad Alessandria

“Il tango di Francesco”. Un racconto di Papa Bergoglio nelle vignette di Mauro Biani

«Un anno dopo, Francesco non è sottoterra. Disonesto dire che Leone vuole cancellarlo»

Badilla. Presunto scontro tra la Santa Sede e l’Amministrazione Trump. La Nunziatura conferma un incontro, il 22 gennaio, nella sede del Pentagono tra il Nunzio e alti funzionari americani

Religión Digital rectifica tras una querella del Opus Dei por las informaciones falsas

Trump attacca il Papa: gelido silenzio d’addio in Vaticano

Leone XIV in Africa per il suo terzo viaggio apostolico

Cei: rammarico per parole Trump, Papa sia rispettato

Cisl solidale con Papa Leone XIV: «Attacco senza precedenti da Trump»

Papa León XIV no vota en las elecciones de Perú pero se salva de pagar multa

Trump attacca Papa Leone: «Un debole, in Vaticano solo grazie a me». La replica: «Non ho paura, non dibatto con lui»

Help Infovaticana continue informing