And that’s what there has been so far.
Something that is completely normal in the Church. And they have given him a broad extension of a year and a half.
On the other hand, there is an informational process regarding alleged sexual abuse that occurred thirty years ago, which has not concluded favorably or unfavorably, and which we will learn about in due time.
Possibly Zornoza should not have been consecrated bishop due to events that occurred in the recently created diocese of Getafe. Its first bishop died with a reputation for sanctity, and even the corresponding canonization process was initiated, which disappeared overnight without any explanation.
Was Rafael Zornoza also involved in that? Rumors existed, but, as far as we know, at the level of rumor.